This Week in Startups

Did the Midterms Destroy All Hope for Data Centers? | E2360

November 6, 2026 68 min episode📝 Transcribed from the audio

This debrief was written and voiced by AI from the episode's audio.

🎧 AI Debrief

0:00 / 3:47

🎙️ Full Episode

0:00 / 1:08:02
🎯

Jason's August prediction about data center dealmaking is already happening

Jason revealed his prediction from August 31, 2026 that Democratic anti-data center campaign rhetoric would flip to pragmatic negotiation post-election. Two days after the midterms, this is already materializing with Texas governor concessions.

✨

Key Moments

🎯
Jason's August prediction about data center dealmaking is already happening0:00

Jason revealed his prediction from August 31, 2026 that Democratic anti-data center campaign rhetoric would flip to pragmatic negotiation post-election. Two days after the midterms, this is already materializing with Texas governor concessions.

data centerspredictionpolitical strategyinfrastructure
✅
The pragmatic middle ground: taxes, clean energy, union labor, community benefits4:57

Jason outlines the deal framework that will satisfy both Democrats and tech companies: sustainable water and electricity use, tax payments, union labor, and community donations. He argues this is politically inevitable and economically sensible.

policycompromisenegotiationinfrastructure
💡
Democrats will be forced to choose between ideology and recession6:40

Jason argues that if Democrats slow AI infrastructure expansion, they risk triggering recession, which will be blamed on them. Pragmatic governance requires accepting data center growth with conditions, not bans.

economicsrecession riskAI growth
🎯
Meme coins are grifting—even Trump shouldn't have done it11:58

Jason clips his own February 2025 warning to Trump about launching meme coins while president. He argued the family should have deferred family crypto ambitions while holding office and focused on the mandate.

cryptocorruptionmeme coinsTrump
📖
How Jason stood his ground on tariffs against peer pressure15:57

Jason explains how he criticized Trump's chaotic tariff policy on All In despite overwhelming social pressure and mockery. He went directly to founders being harmed, did research, and called balls and strikes.

tariffsconvictionjournalismTrump
💡
The Republican civil war: tech oligarchs vs. America First23:57

Jason identifies the core split in the Republican Party: tech billionaires pushing growth and deregulation versus America First populists worried about job displacement and wealth consolidation from AI.

Republican PartyAIjobspolitical fracture
✅
OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic announce data center commitments to head off regulation34:51

Within days of the anti-data-center midterm vote, OpenAI published commitments to pay full power costs, solicit community input, and avoid NDAs with officials. Meta, Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic followed suit.

data centerspolicycorporate responsibility
💡
Copyright disputes are shifting from fair use courts to licensing deals40:23

Jason explains the four layers of AI copyright risk: stolen content (already settled), terms of service violations, training data rights (unsettled), and output fair use (unsettled). Anthropic's AP deal signals licensing will become standard.

copyrightAI licensingfair useAnthropic
✅
Jason's proposal: tech companies should fund creators directly42:58

Jason argues that if tech companies have $100 billion in revenue, they should commit 1–3 percent annually to content creators, media, Substack, books, newspapers. This would align interests and solve lawsuits preemptively.

copyrightcreator economyrevenue sharing
🤯
Apple cutting AI spending caps signals token scarcity and pricing pressure ahead46:59

Apple cut its engineering teams' daily AI spending from $300 to $200, with further cuts planned. This signals that token scarcity and energy constraints are tightening, and per-seat costs will rise industry-wide.

AppleAI pricingtoken scarcitybusiness model

Search Episode

midterms 2026data centersAI regulationinfrastructure investmentDemocratic governanceAI licensing and copyrighttech policyenergy and sustainabilitymarket volatilitycontent licensingfair usememe coins and cryptotariffsTrump administrationRepublican Partytech CEO positioningAI spending and tokensAnthropicOpenAIcompetitive dynamics

Summary

On the Friday after the midterms, Jason Calacanis dissects why the market panic over Democrats' anti-data-center messaging is overblown. Despite voters rejecting rapid AI expansion and data center construction bans passing in Ohio, Kansas, Florida, California, and Texas, Jason argues that campaign rhetoric will transform into pragmatic dealmaking once officials take office. He predicted this pivot months ago: Democrats will negotiate with tech companies for tax payments, sustainable energy use, union labor, and community benefits rather than imposing blanket bans. The episode reviews Jason's track record on Trump's AI policy (which he graded A+), tariff chaos, meme coins, and the civil war within the Republican Party between tech oligarchs and America First advocates. OpenAI, Meta, Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic have already announced data center commitments. Jason frames the current market dip as a generational buying opportunity and warns that slowing AI infrastructure would trigger recession. He also covers Anthropic's first content licensing deal with the AP, Apple's aggressive cuts to AI spending caps for engineers, and broader questions about how tech leaders will recalibrate their public positioning now that Democrats hold Congress.

Key Takeaways

1

Democrats will likely compromise with tech companies on data centers post-election, trading restrictions for taxes, clean energy, union labor, and community investment—reversing campaign anti-AI rhetoric once governance begins.

high
2

The market panic over data center bans is overblown; tech infrastructure expansion is economically essential and will face bipartisan pressure to proceed despite midterm anti-AI sentiment.

high
3

Jason's August prediction that campaign anti-data-center posturing would transform into post-election dealmaking has already begun materializing with Texas governor Eno o sa's conciliatory language.

high
4

AI content licensing disputes remain unresolved; Anthropic's first AP deal and the broader copyright lawsuits signal that fair use questions on training data and real-time output will shape industry liability and licensing costs.

medium
5

Trump's support for tech and data centers during his presidency earned him an A+ from Jason; his chaotic tariff execution and refusal to delegate strategically undermined otherwise sound policy instincts.

medium
6

The Republican Party faces an internal civil war between tech oligarchs and America First advocates over job displacement from AI; this ideological split weakened Trump's coalition and bolstered Democratic messaging.

medium
7

Tech CEO alignment is transactional rather than ideological; expect public repositioning toward Democrats if they return to power, mirroring the swift pivot to Trump in 2024.

low

Notable Quotes

“They got all the donations from the data center and tech folks. Then election comes up. Hey, AI is not popular. We're anti data center. After the election, they get their office for another two to four years. You know what their position's gonna be? We sit down with the data center people. We made peace.”

— Jason Calacanis

Jason explaining his August prediction that campaign anti-AI posturing would flip to pragmatic dealmaking post-election; this has already begun with Texas governor concessions.

“I just always go look for the truth, and I am humble in my approach to that... I'm a truth seeking missile.”

— Jason Calacanis

Jason defending his contrarian positions on Trump's tariffs and meme coins against social pressure from peers; emphasizes first-hand sourcing over partisan rhetoric.

“Data centers aren't gonna impact your local electrical bill. We use recycled water only. We use much less water than the golf course, and you have seven golf courses there... Repetition equals people remembering it.”

— Jason Calacanis

Jason advising tech companies to repeat simple, factual messaging about data center safety to counter misinformation; demonstrates his communication strategy for overcoming public fear.

“The civil war in that party is people's jobs, America first, and these tech oligarchs... are they running away with this and stealing everybody's money?”

— Host

Host articulating the fault line within the Republican Party between populist/America First advocates and tech billionaires; explains why Bannon, Tucker, and others have distanced themselves.

Predictions

Texas governor Eno o sa will negotiate data center tax payments, sustainable energy commitments, union labor, and community benefits rather than imposing a blanket pause on construction.

— Jason Calacanis · Confidence: high · Within 6 months of taking office in 2027

Tech CEO public positioning will shift back toward Democratic values and causes if Democrats return to power, despite current alignment with Trump.

— Jason Calacanis · Confidence: high · 2-4 years if a Democrat wins the presidency

Content licensing will become the standard model for AI companies training on and outputting published content, driven by litigation and deals like Anthropic–AP partnership.

— Jason Calacanis · Confidence: medium · 2-3 years

A recession is likely if data center and AI infrastructure expansion is significantly slowed by regulatory action or public opposition.

— Jason Calacanis · Confidence: medium · 1-2 years

Tech pricing for AI services will increase substantially, with monthly costs per employee rising from $40-$50 to $100-$300+ within 2-3 years as token scarcity and demand increase.

— Jason Calacanis · Confidence: medium · 2-3 years

Action Items

If you believe in fundamental AI infrastructure demand, consider buying dips in mega-cap tech stocks (Amazon, Uber, Tesla, SpaceX positions) during market volatility.

Jason is personally buying tech stocks during the post-midterm selloff; he views current valuations as a generational buying opportunity for long-term investors.

For startups relying on AI services, audit your token usage and budget for potential price increases; prepare for per-seat costs to rise from $40-$50/month to $100-$300+ within 2-3 years.

Apple and other companies are cutting AI spending caps due to token scarcity; this signals broader pricing pressure across the industry.

Data center developers and AI companies should invest in proactive community engagement, transparent sustainability reporting, and local benefit agreements to preempt regulatory restrictions.

Jason emphasizes repetition and emotional resonance in messaging; companies that frame data centers as job creators and community investors will fare better than those hiding behind corporate talking points.

Publishers, content creators, and media companies should explore direct licensing deals with AI companies rather than relying solely on litigation; the Anthropic–AP model may become industry standard.

Copyright disputes are shifting from fair use debates to licensing negotiations; early movers may negotiate better terms than those who wait.

Tech leaders should develop a principled, non-partisan public stance on policy (e.g., supporting the sitting president while calling balls and strikes) to insulate from accusations of opportunism or hypocrisy.

Jason argues that transparent, consistent positions are more defensible than rapid ideological pivots; this approach has worked for him across multiple administrations.